Latest Posts
View the latest posts in an easy-to-read list format, with filtering options.
On September 17, 2018 the President declassified parts of the Inspector General’s FISA report and ordered the DOJ and the FBI to release those documents unredacted to the public. This has caused panic in the Washington establishment, as many of them know that once their crimes have been exposed, they can no longer hide behind classified documents.
The Republican Party has little to lose in this regard, since there was no Russian collusion on the part of the Trump campaign. The Democratic Party, on the other hand, are shaking in their boots and demanding to keep their own Russian collusion secret. In fact, not only did Hillary Clinton and her campaign collude with the Russians, but they also colluded with the UK and other countries (Australia in particular).
All of them were involved in treasonous crimes, breaking numerous laws in the process. As Q often says, “Those who scream the loudest…” (are the ones most fearful and guilty).
Today, Trump posted the tweets below.
So there is a short delay in releasing the documents (20 pages) in question, and Trump has asked Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General, to review these. If he thinks that some things should be redacted, Trump will go along with it. But it is clear that nothing will be redacted just for being an embarrassment to the DOJ or FBI or one of the “key allies” involved in this scandal.
From other posts and news articles, it is clear that the “key allies” are the UK and Australia. Trump says that these “key allies called to ask not to release” this information from the FISA warrant. The question is this: How do those “key allies” know what is in the secret FISA warrant? Why would they beg for secrecy, unless they were personally involved in the scandal?
Q then posted this today:
Q asks this:
Ask yourself, how would ‘FOREIGN Allies’ KNOW what is within a US TOP SECRET FISA warrant?
Q then adds a quotation from Devon Nunes who stated some time ago:
“NO INTELLIGENCE SHARED THROUGH THAT ‘OFFICIAL CHANNEL’ [FVEY]
Q pointed out some time ago that intelligence from the Five Eyes (FVEY) was supposed to go through official channels that were then put on record. But in regard to the secret FISA applications, nothing was done through official channels in order to cover their tracks and hide the fact that the UK and Australia were participating in this dubious plot.
Now at least two Five Eyes countries are worried that 20 unredacted pages of the FISA report will embarrass them for their participation in this plot to undermine and even overthrow President Trump. Apparently, they know that the rules were broken, along with the law itself. So Q says,
Ask yourself why are [2] ‘KEY’ Allies VERY CONCERNED re DECLAS & RELEASE?
Q then reposts something from July 3, 2018….
The link above reads in part:
Papadopoulos was reportedly told by a Maltese professor named Joseph Mifsud that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of emails. Downer requested a meeting with Papadopoulos weeks afterward. Papadopoulos reportedly told Downer in May 2016 that he was told Russia had dirt on Clinton, but did not specify “emails.”
The conversation was reportedly passed on from Downer to Amb. Joe Hockey, who is Australia’s ambassador to the United States. Hockey reportedly passed on the conversation to the U.S. after the emails were released on July 22, 2016.
Normally, intelligence passed on from a member of the “Five Eyes” alliance — Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the U.K., and the U.S. — to another member comes through an official channel for intelligence sharing.
However, Nunes, upon reviewing the document that formally launched the FBI’s investigation, said there was no intelligence shared through that official channel, meaning that the intelligence was shared through unofficial means.
On May 31, the Wall Street Journal‘s Kimberley Strassel reported that Hockey “neither transmitted any information to the FBI nor was approached by the U.S. about the tip.”
“Rather,” she reported, “it was Mr. Downer who at some point decided to convey his information—to the U.S. Embassy in London.”
So it appears that some people will be in big trouble when these pages from the FISA report are released and their names exposed for breaking the law.
Democrats such as Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi try to give the impression that they are concerned about harming national security. In fact, they are trying to shield those within the intelligence community who have violated the law and intelligence protocol in regard to national security.
In fact, Q informed his readers about this on April 18, 2018:
He says that these people were avoiding US data collection laws. “Hussein” is President Barack Hussein Obama, who led this violation of the law, along with Hillary Rodham Clinton, John Brennan of the CIA, James Clapper of National Security, and others.
The Deep State are on the defensive and are fighting for their lives. Two years ago they were on the offensive, but now they are playing defense.
The game is soon over.